More info here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7310168.stm
This woman spent “seven years in jail for attempted bombings and second-degree murder during a campaign in 1975.” She spent after this “almost a quarter of a century, marrying and living undetected in Minnesota.” (BBC News) Then she gets let out, and a week later put back in cause some people decided she wasn’t punished enough yet.
What is the purpose of our jail system, honestly? Isn’t it to keep dangerous people off the streets? Sarah Jane Olson is no longer a dangerous person. She spent almost a quarter of a century living peacefully. I think that clearly shows that she is not a threat. However, we insist on jailing her for crimes past. I am not saying she shouldn’t pay for her crimes, but I fail to see how jailing her is productive in any way to any one. Her time would be better spent in community service, giving back to the community and making this world a better place to live in rather than sucking the life a little more out of one person who has already been tamed by society.
I think this move to put her back in prison is totally pointless. What’s one more year? Will she suddenly be more sorry in a year? Will her debts be more paid in a year? No. Nothing changes except a woman lost her freedom for 7 (8 total) years. That’s it. Nothing was gained. Only time, money, energy was lost.
To jail someone who has already proven they can be a civilized member of society is a pointless act, and if our justice system is so keen on doing so then I say we need an overhauling of the system.
Lia Cross